[ad_1]
Federal court of appeals dismissed excitementlawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxtonwho blamed he is He is accused of retaliating against the social media platform’s ban on former President Donald Trump.
excitementProcedural defeat on Wednesday allows for Texas investigation excitement To continue, but the end can still be slapped in the future.
Mr. Paxton launched an investigation against excitement Trump last year and the Texas Republican issued a civil inquiry request for information about the company’s content moderation policies.
excitement He sued in response, saying the request was government retaliation for speech protected by the First Amendment.
The US 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said Wednesday: excitement‘s case was not ready for judicial decision. The three-judge panel affirming a lower court’s decision to drop the case, Mr. Paxton He has not yet made a claim against excitement.
“Duration excitement The court may have difficulty stopping its consideration, deciding this case now will require determining whether it is. excitement Previously violated Texas’ unfair trade practices law [Texas’ attorney general] In the Court’s view, Judge Ryan D. Nelson has a good chance of completing his investigation,” he wrote.
“Any difficulties excitement “The alleged standoff of First Amendment rights was insufficient to overcome the uncertainty of the legal question presented in the case,” Judge Nelson wrote.
Judgment of the judges against excitement It doesn’t mean victory for Mr. Paxton or i mean her investigation will force excitement To restore Mr Trump’s access.
The court made clear that determining whether content moderation was protected speech or political censorship was at the center of the case, saying that false statements about content moderation policies were not constitutionally protected speech.
“If excitementStatements of ‘s must be commercial speech protected, then [the Texas attorney general’s] An investigation would be unlawful if it would prevent a person of ordinary sternness from speaking out, and if it was mainly or partly for a motivational reason. excitement‘content moderation decisions,’ the judge wrote.
“But if excitement‘s statements are misleading commercial speech and are therefore unprotected, then excitement“Content moderation decisions would be an appropriate reason for investigation, as these would be acts that make speech misleading,” he said.
Mr. Paxton‘s office did not comment on the outcome of Wednesday’s case.
A excitement The spokesperson said that the decision was made by the company, Mr. Paxtonactions.
“In this situation, we believe the Texas Attorney General has abused his powers. her office for violation excitementThe spokesperson said in a statement that he has fundamental rights to silence freedom of expression.
[ad_2]
Source link