[ad_1]
“For example, if a shooter breaks into a church and a drone is deployed and takes down the shooter, we simply cannot cheer for that feat,” said Mr. Smith. “We need to examine the video closely and meticulously.”
Resigning board members said in a statement that the ethics committee had warned the company for years against the use of products that could spy on people in real time.
“This type of surveillance will undoubtedly harm communities of color and others who are overly policed and possibly far beyond that,” they said. “The Taser-equipped drone also doesn’t have a realistic chance of solving the mass shooting problem that Axon is currently prescribing, it’s simply diverting society from real solutions to a tragic problem.”
Barry Friedman, director of the New York University Law School Policing Project, one of the resigning board members, said in an interview that he was glad Axon had stopped its plans for the drone project and hoped the company would do just that. leave it completely.
“I think it’s very important that we find a way to restrict the adoption of technologies, which often happens with little concern about harming privacy, harming racial justice, or concerns about how much data the government holds on all of us and what the government has access to,” he said.
Giles Herdale, one of the board members who decided not to resign, said he hoped he could “try to mitigate the damage caused by such developments” by staying on the board.
“Our being there is to try to put perspectives to give them pause to think about,” said Mr Herdale, an associate member of the Royal United Services Institute, a London think tank specializing in security issues.
[ad_2]
Source link