Meetings suck. Can we make them more fun?

[ad_1]

This is how queue groups work: on the one hand, fun elements can make meetings more interesting and inspire ideas, but on the other hand, such meetings are more difficult to set up and can seem tricky. “We see certain challenges with social connections,” Teevan says. Microsoft is aggressively trying to invent meeting tools like Facebook. One is the Together Mode he created for Teams software, which uses artificial intelligence to hack user profiles and place them in a virtual environment.

Teevan says employees feel increasingly isolated when working remotely and are desperate for connection. Microsoft’s internal research shows that employees are becoming more stereotypical in the video conferencing environment, which can lead to bad decisions. “We code our existing social networks,” he says. Games can expand these networks, increase trust and even lead to better decisions.

Sílvia Fornós, a PhD student at the Computer Games Research Center at the University of Informatics in Copenhagen, recently helped organize a one-week summit. To collectA virtual space where users can hold meetings in a pixelated, 8-bit environment, after finding Slack and Zoom insufficient to connect with other conference participants. Fornós says the ’80s style adds a sense of informality and comfort to meetings rather than distracting.

However, the actual link was missing, he found. “Team bonding is a fundamental part of multidisciplinary research and has a direct impact on our work,” he says. “We need to find a middle ground, such as hybrid spaces that offer the flexibility of virtual spaces with the ability to socialize and participate in person when needed.”

This middle ground in meeting technology is where profit and need intersect, and Facebook hopes Horizons Workroom will fill that need – no matter how silly it may seem to talk to your boss’s animated avatar in virtual reality. Even King admitted that Horizons Workroom “was a bit cumbersome for me.”

Jeremy Bailenson, professor of communications at Stanford University and founder of the Virtual Human Interaction Lab, suggests the solution may lie somewhere between traditional and game-like videoconferencing technologies. This summer, he conducted an experiment where 102 students worked on both Zoom and the VR platform Engage for more than 60,000 minutes.

“Should we stay in Zoom or use VR? The answer is yes, we should do both,” says Bailenson. This week’s study showed that medicine Meeting is very important. “If you have a talking head and everyone else is just listening, Zoom is great for that,” he says. But if you need to take action or have small group chats, immersive VR is better for that.” He found that VR was a better way for people to read nonverbal cues like bowing or making eye contact, which are crucial for building trust and understanding.

But Bailenson admits that VR isn’t at a point where we can use it for more than a few minutes at a time before our perception is shaken.

[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *