OnlyFans suspends plans to ban sexually explicit content from popular sites

[ad_1]

OnlyFans reversed course on Wednesday and halted its plans to ban “obscene” content from its popular user-generated, subscription-based service.

The approximate facial expression of OnlyFans, a digital platform that started in 2016, came less than a week after it announced it would ban obscene material from October 1, causing an uproar among many users.

“Thank you everyone for making your voice heard. “We have provided the necessary safeguards to support our diverse community of creators and have suspended the planned October 1 policy change,” said OnlyFans.

“OnlyFans stands for inclusivity and we will continue to provide a home to all creators,” the London-based company said in a statement shared on social media. Said.

OnlyFans allows users to sell and buy exclusive access to digital content, making it especially popular with sex workers who generate income by creating and uploading their own photos and videos.

Many of these adult creators were frightened for their future after OnlyFans announced that it would begin banning sexually explicit material.

In its original announcement, OnlyFans said it would ban explicit content “to ensure the long-term sustainability of our platform,” citing pressure from payment and banking partners.

OnlyFans founder and CEO Tim Stokely later said in an interview published just before the cancellation decision was announced, his company had no choice but to start banning explicit content.

“JPMorgan Chase has been particularly aggressive in closing the accounts of sex workers or any business that supports sex workers,” Mr Stokely said, as the Financial Times reported on Tuesday. The report said the bank declined to comment.

OnlyFans did not explain why it changed plans.

According to the company, more than 150 million people are OnlyFans users, including more than 1.5 million creators. These creators are paid a total of about $5 million a year.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Thank you for being a Washington Times reader. Comments are temporarily disabled. We apologize for the inconvenience caused.



[ad_2]

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *