[ad_1]
two old Facebook workers’ testimony House Lawmakers on Wednesday announced a major hurdle to any new crackdown. Congress In big tech, Democrats and Republicans have different views on censorship.
an ex Facebook The worker called for any technical intervention to ensure “less censorship,” while the other former employee declined to say whether tech companies should censor Americans’ speech.
Lawmakers from the House Energy and Commerce Committee met in a subcommittee session Wednesday to discuss options for holding big tech companies accountable, including changing the legal liability protections provided through Section 230 of the Communications Ethics Act.
Previous Facebook Self-described whistleblower Frances Haugen caught public attention when she filed a criminal complaint earlier this year. Facebook from harming children and from documents he received from his former employer. Congress and journalists.
his reviews Facebook‘s alleged harm has been praised by both Democrats and Republicans, but the comfort that big tech companies have decided who is free to speak online has raised eyebrows among Republicans.
At Wednesday’s hearing, Ms. Haugen repeatedly refused to directly answer the Representative’s questions. Cathy McMorris RodgersThe Washington Republican on whether big tech companies should restrict Americans from speaking.
“The question is, yes or no, do you support their censorship of speech, which is constitutionally protected under the First Amendment?” Woman. Rodgers asked.
“I believe there should be things like fact-checks as well as content,” Ms. Haugen replied. “I think the current system-”
“I think I take that as a no,” interrupted Mrs. Rodgers.
“I think there are solutions we need to use better than censorship,” said Ms. Haugen.
Ms. Haugen’s interpretation differed sharply from the previous one. Facebook Black Frederick, now at the conservative Heritage Foundation. Describing her work, Mrs. Frederick, Facebook It covers the company’s counter-terrorism analysis program, which calls big tech companies “enemies of the public.”
“Let the whistleblower docs speak for themselves, blaming big technology should result in less censorship,” said Ms. Frederick. “In fact, the First Amendment should be the standard from which all Chapter 230 reforms emerge.”
Democratic and Republican lawmakers have made many proposals to reduce the power of tech companies, from taking advantage of antitrust action to changing laws that affect the way platforms manage their users’ conversations. Most of the bids have been discontinued. Congress and the Biden administration is prioritizing other legislation involving social spending and infrastructure.
Democrats appeared eager Wednesday to spur the momentum for new technical rules that could shift the balance of power in the country ahead of next year’s midterm elections. Congress, and which side is leading the way in writing new laws for digital platforms.
“There is a bipartisan desire to reform the courts’ interpretation of Section 230, and the American people want us to get things done,” said Pennsylvania Democratic Representative Mike Doyle. “I urge all of my Republican and Democrat colleagues to bring their ideas forward now and work together on bipartisan legislation because we can’t keep waiting. The biggest tech companies Congress fighting among themselves when nothing is happening.”
Various proposals to curb the behavior of tech companies garner bipartisan support, Democrats worry about the further spread of misinformation and disinformation online, and Republicans worry that people’s voices are being silenced by companies and governments.
“As we work on key reforms like protecting civil rights, accountability to social media companies, protecting our children, the Republicans’ main opposition today, the talking point of the day is asking for a license to lie,” he said. Florida Democrat Darren Soto said at the hearing. “According to our Supreme Court, deliberate lies are the right to lie without consequences, if not freedom of speech in the New York Times v. Sullivan case.”
Woman. Rodgerssaid but he perceived the actions of tech companies as one-sided against conservatives and he He believes the American people are fed up.
“Obviously, many Americans have lost confidence in big tech, and that’s because they arbitrarily censor speech they disagree with, and the censorship seems to be in one direction – this goes against conservative content,” he said. Rodgers said. “As we think about solutions for how to hold big tech accountable, we definitely have to be thoughtful about bringing transparency and accountability.”
Whether shared hostility towards big tech will overcome the lack of trust between Republican and Democratic lawmakers will determine whether any tech legislation will reach the desired level. House Deputies participate in re-election and the Senate.
[ad_2]
Source link