[ad_1]
This article is part of the On Tech newsletter. Here is a collection past columns.
In a Facebook group for gardeners, automated systems of the social network sometimes marked discussions about a common backyard tool as inappropriate sexual speech.
Facebook frozen the accounts of some Native Americans because their computers mistakenly believed names like Lance Browneyes were fake.
The company has repeatedly rejected ads It’s in a shambles from businesses that sell clothing for the disabled, often mixing products for medical promotions and against their rules.
Renamed to Meta, Facebook and other social networks should call for compelling decisions to support freedom of expression while excluding undesirable material such as images of child sexual abuse, violent provocation and financial fraud. However, this was not the case in the examples above. These were errors made by a computer that could not handle the nuances.
Social networks are fundamental public spaces that are too large and fast-moving for everyone to manage effectively. Wrong calls happen.
These glaring mistakes aren’t as important as deciding whether Facebook should kick the former US president off its website. But ordinary people, businesses and public interest groups such as news organizations they suffer when social networks hack their accounts and can’t find help or understand what they’re doing wrong.
This doesn’t happen often, but a small percentage of Facebook’s size errors add up. Wall Street Journal calculated Facebook can handle about 200,000 false searches per day.
People who research social networks have told me that Facebook—and its peers, though I’ll focus on Facebook here—can do a lot more to make fewer mistakes and lessen the harm when things get messy.
The mistakes also raise a bigger question: Are we willing to let companies be so important that there’s little we can do when they don’t fix them?
The company’s critics and the semi-independent Facebook Oversight Board have repeatedly said that Facebook should make it easier for users whose posts have been deleted or whose accounts have been disabled to understand what rules they’re breaking and to appeal calls for judgment. Facebook has done some of this, but not enough.
Researchers also want Investigate Facebook’s data analyzing his decision-making process and how often he made mistakes. The company tends to oppose this idea as an intrusion into its users’ privacy.
Facebook said it’s trying to be more transparent and is spending billions of dollars on computer systems and humans to control communication in its apps. People will not agree with their decisions about posts no matter what.
But critics say it still doesn’t do enough.
“These are tough legal issues, and I wouldn’t want to make these tradeoffs and decisions,” he said. Evelyn Douek, senior research fellow at the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University. “But I don’t think they’ve invested enough resources yet to say they’ve tried everything or that we have the optimal number of bugs.”
Most companies that make mistakes face serious consequences. Facebook rarely does. Ryan CaloA professor at the University of Washington law school made a comparison between Facebook and building demolition.
When companies demolish buildings, debris or vibrations can damage property and even injure people. Calo told me that because of the inherent risks, laws in the US hold demolition companies to a high standard of accountability. Companies should take security measures and cover possible damages. These potential consequences ideally make them more mindful.
However, Calo said that the laws governing liability on the internet are not sufficient to hold companies liable for any harm that may be caused by the restriction of this information or information.
“It’s time to stop pretending that this is so different from other societal harms,” Calo said.
Before you go …
hug this
It Boy shoveling snow is tired (DEEP SIGH) and he wants to tell you everything.
We want to hear from you. Tell us what you think of this newsletter and what else you would like us to discover. You can reach us at ontech@nytimes.com.
If you have not yet received this newsletter in your inbox, please register here. You can also read History in technology columns.
[ad_2]
Source link