[ad_1]
OnlyFans has a surprising new member: the Vienna Tourist Board.
No, your account will not include after-hours photos of employees. Instead, the board will use the adults-only site to show images of paintings and sculptures on display in the Austrian capital that have been blocked by social media sites for nudity or sexual content.
Disturbing artworks include the Venus of Willendorf, a 25,000-year-old limestone female statuette. A few years ago, Facebook removed a photo of it from the Vienna Museum of Natural History’s page for being “pornographic”.
There is also an early 20th century painting “Liebespaar” by Koloman Moser, which the Leopold Museum included in a video post celebrating its anniversary in September. Christine Kociu, the museum’s social media manager, said the video, which was blocked by Instagram and Facebook’s algorithms, “is a combination of the details of the work evoked by the painting and the written emotion.” “It shows a naked couple embracing. It’s actually sweet.”
Although nudity is generally not allowed on Instagram and Facebook, the platforms make some exceptions.
For example, Instagram Community Guides Say: “Photos in the context of breastfeeding, childbirth and postpartum moments, health-related situations (e.g. post mastectomy, breast cancer awareness or gender reaffirmation surgery) or protest action are allowed. Nudity is also not a problem in painting and sculpture photographs.”
your facebook Charter “paintings, sculptures and other works of art” and allowing nudity in TikTok photos Writer may “allow exceptions” to the ban on nudity and obscene content.
Despite the flexibility of the platforms’ guidelines, museums and other institutions that publish art photos have found that examples of nudity are not always considered acceptable. One reason may be that censorship on social media is less of a public issue than the sensitivity of artificial intelligence used to flag content that violates a site’s guidelines.
Social media platforms did not respond to requests for comment on how the rules were contradictory and how they were enforced.
“It’s not an anti-tech agenda that we have,” said Norbert Kettner, director of the Vienna Tourism Board. However, after the city’s museums were faced with social media removals one after another, we thought, “What could be the alternative? What would a channel be where nudity isn’t an issue in itself?’”
Mr. Kettner said the OnlyFans account is not a permanent solution, it is a protest and chat call against censorship. “We want to draw attention to something specific,” he said. “We want to bring that out to talk about the role of artificial intelligence, of algorithms.”
This is not the first time the tourism board has taken a public stand against censorship. In 2017, the board approached several cities with a proposal to show large-scale advertisements featuring nude portraits of Egon Schiele, an early 20th-century Austrian artist known for his powerful depictions of the human form.
“We wanted to know how much we as a society can deal with nudity that was produced 100-110 years ago?” said Mr. Kettner. Not so much as you can see.
Officials in the UK and Germany found the footage too revealing. In the end, the Vienna tourist board decided to use the rejection as an opportunity. Posters appeared in London, Hamburg, Cologne and New York with some body parts obscured by strips of text and read “Sorry, 100 years old but still very daring today”.
Vienna is not the only city whose art is censored on the internet. Many artworks from all over the world have been erroneously identified as pornography by artificial intelligence. Facebook, by the Boston Museum of Fine Arts (by Imogen Cunningham photos naked bodies), Philadelphia Museum of Art (a table A woman licking an ice cream cone by Evelyne Axell) and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York (from 1917). table Portrait of a nude woman by Amedeo Modigliani).
A teacher in France has sued Facebook after deleting its social network account after it posted a picture of Gustave Courbet’s “Origin of the World,” a painting by which a 19th-century woman’s vagina is the focal point. court in 2018 managed He said Facebook was at fault but did not pay any compensation to the plaintiff. And in 2016 a politician in Denmark said: failed to post a link to your blog It’s on Facebook because the post featured a photo of “The Little Mermaid,” a public sculpture in Copenhagen that shows too much skin by the social network’s standards.
Ms. Kociu said that over the past few years, Facebook and Instagram’s algorithms have evolved to identify works of art. That’s why the platforms’ video ad for “Liebespaar” and the decision to block a nude self-portrait of Schiele surprised him.
In such cases, there is no other way but to submit an objection to the platform. “Sometimes it’s depressing,” said Ms. Kociu. “People can decide whether they like artworks or not, but it’s weird not being able to show them because of an algorithm.”
situation worse for contemporary artists, said Mr. Kettner. “Young artists are addicted to online channels,” he said. “We think and feel that there is a kind of unconscious self-censorship in the brains of these artists. ‘What can I post?’ This is even more serious. The algorithm is suddenly in a position to determine our cultural heritage for tomorrow.”
[ad_2]
Source link