Happy Nice Mall

SIOUX FALLS, SD — cyber expert in “red team” hired by MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell now says the key data that supports the theory: Chinese Hacking the 2020 elections announced at the Cyber ​​Symposium is illegitimate.

Mr. Lindell aforementioned He He had 37 terabytes of “irrefutable” evidence. He Said it was supported by Chineseentered the electoral systems and changed the vote in favor of President Biden. He said the evidence could be seen in compromised network data or “packet captures” collected by hackers, which may have been unencrypted to reveal that a cyberattack had taken place and the votes had been altered.

But cyber expert Josh Merritt, who was on the team recruited by Mr. Lindell To query the data for the symposium, he told the Washington Times that packet captures cannot be recovered in data, and the data provided cannot prove a cyberattack. Chinese.

“Our team said that if we don’t trust the information, we won’t say it’s legitimate,” Mr. Merritt said on Wednesday, the second day of the symposium.

Mr. Merritt broke up with Mr. Merritt. Lindell It hastened the unraveling of a months-long conspiracy theory of the MyPillow millionaire. He He said he would reverse the outcome of the 2020 election and bring former President Donald Trump back to the White House.

He offered $5 million to any face-to-face participant who could prove otherwise her claims. Mr Merritt said the offer is no longer on the table.

Leading the seminar, Mr. Lindell showed a scrolling, incomprehensible video of text. He were alleged packet captures He received – proof, He alleged her Chinese hack theory Video featured in: her The documentary “Absolute 9-0” was played cyclically throughout the congress center throughout the symposium.

Cybersecurity expert J. Kirk Wiebe, a former National Security Agency analyst and whistleblower, also said of Mr. Kirk Wiebe: Lindell did not have actual datasets.

He That said, the scrolling text should probably look like what packet captures would look like in the dataset, but not actual packet captures that are vital to proving the claims.

Several cyber experts at the symposium were frustrated late on the first day by the lack of packet captures.

Mr. Merritt and Mr. Wiebe said lost packet captures could either be a result of the format the data was sent in, or that they were stored by information source Dennis L. Montgomery.

Mr. Montgomery is a former government contractor who developed cyber tools called HAMMER and SCORECARD, which are allegedly used by the US to influence foreign elections. Mr Montgomery came forward with the data after he said the tools were used to influence US elections, according to Mr Wiebe.

Mr Merritt confirmed that the source of the data was Mr Montgomery.

However, the data Mr. Montgomery sends does not contain packet capture and cannot be used to verify Mr. Montgomery. Lindellmarquee theory, which He Two experts said they plan to explain at the symposium.

It was reported that Mr. Montgomery had suffered a stroke on the eve of the symposium and was not in contact with Mr. Montgomery. Lindellteam or any cyber expert at the symposium.

He He was behind several other high-profile conspiracy theories, including allegations that US security agencies eavesdropped on Trump Tower as Mr Trump ran for president in 2016.

Mr. Montgomery said he presented the wiretapping evidence to then-FBI Director James B. Comey and denied the information. Mr. Montgomery later sued Mr. Comey, alleging a cover-up. The case was dropped.

Mr Montgomery also openly claimed that the 2020 elections were manipulated, which Christopher Krebs, former director of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said was a “hoax”.

Still, Mr Merritt said the data contained substantial “forensic” evidence of manipulated voters.

“We were given a shit,” he said. “And I had to take that mess and turn it into diamonds. And I think that’s what we did.”

Symposium organizers released data on Wednesday in front of audiences, which they say shows tampering with the 2020 presidential election in Mesa County, Colorado. The presentation was tentative and separate from Mr. Lindell’s original claim about a nationwide hack.

Mesa County’s clerk and recorder, Tina Peters, made the headlines on Day One of the meeting. Ms. Peters is under investigation from her office for a possible breach of election security.

Mr. Lindell’s team did not confirm the source of the data used for Wednesday’s presentation.

The leader of the red team, Phil Waldron, said that only a small part of the data was given to the red team a few days before the symposium.

Mr Waldron said the remaining data that was not questioned during the symposium could include packet captures and other data needed to prove it. Chinese They hacked the election. He also said there is ample evidence in the data pointing to other important selection anomalies that are just as important and worth opening up during the symposium.

Kurt Olsen, a lawyer on Mr. Lindell’s team, said the data Mr. Lindell gave had multiple sources. Lindell claims to have it and has not confirmed that Mr Mongtomery is the source of the data. He also clarified that the $5 million challenge has not been canceled and that Mr Merritt will not be exclusive to this information.

Disclosure: The article previously described Mr Merritt as: Lindell‘s leading cyber expert. Mr. Merritt is a cyber expert in the red team hired by Mr. Merritt. Lindell to query the data for the symposium and directly to Mr. Lindell.