[ad_1]
The outcome of the case was not unheard of in a country. as everyone knows strict defamation lawsMichael Douglas, a senior lecturer in private law at the University of Western Australia, said it was unusual for the accused not to be another politician or a high-profile journalist.
“This is consistent with the theme that the government is happy to take a very harsh approach to online conversation, which it dislikes,” he said. “Cases like this are a warning that we will see more cases like this unless things change, and every Australian should step up carefully before retweeting a quote and naming a politician.”
Mr Dutton has been clear about his intention to block misleading or defamatory social media content. In march, said A local radio station said, “Some of these people who are trending on Twitter or have the anonymity of different Twitter accounts post all these statements and tweets that are downright defamatory – I’ll start by picking some sue.”
Prime Minister Scott Morrison He repeated this sentiment in October, when the government promised to do more to hold the social media giants accountable.
“Social media has become a palace of cowards where people can go out there without saying who they are and ruin people’s lives and say the most disgusting and offensive things to people and do it with impunity,” Mr Morrison said.
In May, New South Wales Deputy Prime Minister John Barilaro filed a defamation lawsuit against Jordan Shanks, an Australian YouTuber, alleging that Mr Shanks had mistakenly uploaded two videos of him involved in corruption, perjury and blackmail. He also said Mr Shanks was racist, attacking his Italian heritage, calling him a “spaghetti-powered crook”.
Mr. Shanks’ channel FriendlyJordies, which has 600,000 subscribers, is known for its comedy and political commentary.
[ad_2]
Source link