Happy Nice Mall

Republican Sen. Charles E. Grassley Biden from Iowa said his administration refused to respond her questions about FBIThe conservative group’s 2016 goal worried women For America, which has raised concerns of political bias in the ranks of the Bureau.

“ FBIAn activity to scrutinize their questions about ‘Congress’ inability to fully answer’ worried women Absolutely unacceptable for America, especially when the bureau has already acknowledged the existence of its activities in response to the United States. [Freedom of Information Act] question,” he said. grass He told the Washington Times.

This FBI announced that, as a result of an assessment he made in July 2016 last year, he determined that there was nothing to watch for in the pro-life group that stood out.

But the agency Mr. grass last December that the bureau felt no need to explain its investigation. worried women He declined to answer questions about America and the lawmaker’s reasoning for the investigation.

“We know, FBI He was also abusing intelligence officials to target conservatives while scrutinizing the CWA. Americans deserve to know how far it is. FBIthe politically accused has gone bad, and whether the CWA is too FBIplus sign,” Mr. grass He told The Times.

This FBICWA’s “benefit assessment” for possible “non-profit embezzlement/corporate fraud”, with no investigations resulted, was uncovered by the US. FBI In response to the FOIA request Cato Institute.

Such assessments may lead to investigations and may include non-court-based surveillance, the use and recruitment of human resources, and review of publicly available information about a target and data collected about the target by federal, state, and local governments. According to the Domestic Internal Directive of the Attorney General’s Office FBI Operations.

Mr. grass Wrote FBI Director and Attorney General Merrick B. Garland requested a statement and records detailing their actions involving the conservative group in July 2021.

This FBI refused to provide his records or reasoning to Mr. grass. FBI Deputy director Jill C. Tyson said in a December 2021 letter that the bureau’s assessments “require an authoritative purpose, even if they do not require specific factual foresight.”

“With regard to your questions regarding certain assessments, the longstanding Ministry of Justice and FBI “The policy prevents the sharing of criminal subject, witness or victim information, including confirming or denying the existence of an investigation.” grass Obtained by the Washington Times. “For this reason FBI can’t comment on public reporting worried women of the [sic] America.”

But FBI already acknowledged the existence of a CWA assessment in response to a FOIA. Cato Institute his senior friend, Patrick Eddington, who first revealed FBIMonitoring the CWA.

Mr Eddington continued to push the federal government for answers, and Cato Institute sued FBI and the Department of Justice to access records on whether and when it happened last year. FBI He went too far in investigating the Americans.

Department of Justice, To Mr Eddington, FBI He was right not to disclose about the CWA-related records. The Information Policy Office of the Ministry of Justice cited laws protecting “intelligence sources and methods” among rules protecting “intelligence sources and methods”. FBI Legal ground for keeping information about the conservative group private, according to a November letter to Mr Eddington.

Mr Eddington said the Justice Department’s response was very worrying, especially this FBI It used classified databases and methods to target CWA.

“It’s very disturbing that they’re going to initiate a national security law that involves intelligence gathering against entities like Russia, China, North Korea, Iran, which should always be outward,” he said. said Mr Eddington. “And, in my view, it’s clearly out of bounds, clearly, completely inappropriate, and definitely something that should be looked into from a congressional investigation point of view.”

worried women America said it has spoken with its lawyers on what to do next if anything happens, and plans to continue working with lawmakers who want to understand what the group is about.

The conservative group is not alone in bringing the US under scrutiny. FBI through reviews of Mr Eddington previously FBI It made hundreds of thousands of reviews based on data obtained by the New York Times in 2011. FBI over 82,000 individual and group assessments for potential abuses in the previous two years.

Mr Eddington wrote last year: Cato Institute He also gathered evidence that FBI He filed reviews on the Muslim Justice League in Massachusetts, a chapter of the League of Women Voters in New York, and the Colorado branch of the International Rescue Committee.

The Ministry of Justice declined to comment on this news. This FBI did not respond to a request for comment and previously referred The Washington Times to information it published under the FOIA.

This FBI Mr. said grass assessments are not unsupportable. Miss Tyson quoted FBI The Domestic Investigations Operations Guide and said assessments can be used to control matters in “less intrusive ways” rather than full-scale investigations.

“The important thing is, [guidelines]The basis of an assessment cannot be arbitrary or unfounded speculation, nor can an assessment be based solely on the application of First Amendment protected activities or on the subject’s race, ethnicity, national origin, or religion.