fbpx

The Age of Applied Technology Is Over


It is clearer than ever that governments will no longer leave technology alone.

Europe mandatory standard phone chargers For portable electronics passing through Texas contentious law to restrict social media companies from moderating online conversation. Tech companies can count on more change as government officials decide how they do business and how we use their products.

This most likely means new technologies driverless cars and facial recognition systems it will take longer for them to spread around the world than they already have. For many technology advocates, more negotiation and oversight will slow down innovation. For others, that’s exactly the point.

I wanted to summarize this in today’s newsletter because it is easy to be overwhelmed (or adjusted) by all attempted government regulation. In just the past few weeks, journalists have written about pending bills in Congress. data privacy and technology antitrust; employment classification drivers for companies like Uber; multiple countries that set standards for how data can and cannot move around the world; Holland forcing apple review payment options for dating apps; and two situation laws in a social media conversation.

All of this is the result of the still evolving rethinking of the relatively laissez-faire approach to technology since the 1990s. With exceptions, the prevailing attitude was that new internet technologies, including digital advertising, e-commerce, social media and employment of “jobs” through apps, were too new, frivolous and useful for governments to restrict them with many rules.

As television and radio did when these tools were new, many tech companies encouraged light regulation, saying they were introducing change for the better, elected officials were too sluggish and uninformed to control them effectively, and that government intervention would undermine progress.

Just one example: A decade ago, Facebook said US rules required TV and radio to disclose who paid for election-related ads. should not apply to that company. The US election agency should not “stand in the way of innovation”. Said a Facebook lawyer at the time.

These adverts aren’t always effective, but after Russia-backed propagandists took to social media ads and free shipping Inflaming American political divisions In 2016, Facebook voluntarily began providing more transparency about political ads.

Better laws or advertising disclosures probably wouldn’t have stopped hostile foreign actors from abusing Facebook to start information wars in the US or other countries. But the impractical conventional wisdom likely contributed to the sense that those in charge of technology should be left alone to do what they want.

“We realized that we were unleashing these powerful forces and failing to create appropriate security measures,” said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group. “In the beginning we could simply say, every technology needs to be regulated in a common sense way.”

Regulators now feel empowered. MPs rolled up their sleeves to make rules for law enforcement to use facial recognition technology. Like those in Texas, there will be more laws to take power from a handful of tech executives. Set free speech rules for billions peoples. More countries to push Apple and Google rebuild the app economy. More edits already changing the way children use technology.

Again, not all of this is going to be good government intervention. But there are more signs of people creating technology. I also want more government oversight – or at least give him the so-called service. Any discussion of emerging technology, including artificial intelligence drawing software Dall-E and cryptocurrencyregularly involves discussions about potential harms and how regulation can minimize them.

This does not mean that people agree on what government surveillance should look like. But the answer is that there is almost never any government intervention. And this is different.

If you have not yet received this newsletter in your inbox, please register here.


  • Nearly 400 car crashes in the US over 10 months involved advanced driver assistance technologiesaccording to federal data reported by my colleagues Neal Boudette and Cade Metz. As I wrote above, federal regulators are trying to better understand the real-world safety of technologies like Tesla’s Autopilot as they become more prevalent.

  • What got lost in the debate on artificial intelligence and human intelligence: A Google employee’s fear that a piece of AI software had become conscious – it didn’t – distracted by immediate concerns Bloomberg News has written about AI, including the bias built into technology and all the people needed for supposedly automated systems. (Subscription may be required.)

  • Sports stream challenge: Apple paid $2.5 billion for the right to broadcast Major League Soccer matches on Athletic, its TV app for Apple devices. reported. two companies in india pay $3 billion to stream cricket matches. These deals are another sign that companies are getting into sports betting to entice people to pay for video streaming services.

I will watch every video of a cat playing poker, Like this.




Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(0)