[ad_1]
UNESCO first in 2010 added hawk He called it “a century-old drama” on the list of “Intangible Cultural Heritage of Humanity”. Since then, according to McNeff, the international falconry community has taken care to distinguish between falconry and falconry in order to preserve the UNESCO-recognised version of the sport that is compatible with NAFAs. ethics policy; states that falconry “must not include the keeping of birds of prey as pets or prestige.” This is because in recent years, particularly in Europe, groups such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals have criticized the use of birds of prey in “shows” or “shows”. on the British website, PETA states: “Falconists view birds of prey such as hawks, owls and eagles as live accessories and display them for tourists. Their lives, tied to a piece of wood by a short leather strap for hours or even days, pass in boredom and torment.”
For gulls, however, Swanson’s current five hawks, 12 hawks and Eurasian eagle-owls are far better than the typical alternative. Only in 2021, US Department of Agriculture killed 17,633 seagulls In the name of wildlife control, with 2,664 falcons, 510 falcons and 359 owls. “You come here and knock out 20,000 gulls—well, that’s 20,000 less birds to clean up the beach,” Swanson says. “Everything happens for a reason.” Amanda Rodewald, an avian biologist at Cornell University, suggests that one of these reasons is the presence of humans, whether they like it or not. “The connections are complex,” she says. “As we eradicate one species, it can be difficult to predict what the consequences will be for other species in this system – we don’t know which species will one day be valuable to us.”
Use of Birds of prey seem to have been invented by the British military at an airbase in Scotland in the 1940s. runways. In the following years, the practice expanded from a Canadian dumpster to cleaning herring and ring-billed gulls, wood pigeons in an English field planted with cabbage and brussels sprouts, and even crows in the Kremlin. Hawks and hawks are so effective because they are so unpredictable that artificial deterrents cannot be, said Thomas L. Freeman, chair of the math and science department at Eastern New Mexico University-Ruidoso, who studies diurnal birds of prey. “You can put out the railings and they will work for a while,” he says. “But in birds of prey, the animals they follow will perceive real danger, dynamic danger.”
[ad_2]
Source link